Monday, June 29, 2009


I was recently reading Dan Wells' blog (the author of 'I Am Not a Serial Killer') and we got into a discussion about the ever-famous California creation...In-N-Out burger. He claims that Jack in the Box is a much better choice and I say he's crazy. Now, I realize that In-N-Out is a fairly simple example of what a burger could be, but I also say it is THE example of what it should be. Toasted bun, a perfectly cooked beef patty that has never been frozen, crisp lettuce, grilled onions melded with american cheese, ripe tomatoes and lots of that special sauce. What's not to love? The problem is that people come from all around expecting some miraculous religious experience when tasting an In-N-Out burger when in reality it is just a burger. I say, strip away the hype. Don't listen to what anyone else says on the matter. It will never live up to it. Go into the experience with your eyes open. Use this system universally for experiencing life and you will never be dissappointed.


  1. If Dan somehow thinks he's justified in claiming that Jack in the Box is better than In N' Out, he probably IS a serial killer. Claiming that any burger is better than a Double-Double (barring gourmet burgers) is borderline sacrelige.

  2. That's right. You tell him, Graham.

  3. LOL I'm soo hungry now. Curses.